W-Order Just Dropped in Microsoft Fabric

I was poking around in the Lakehouse settings after the latest Fabric update rolled out last night, and noticed something I have not seen documented anywhere yet.

Buried in the optimization section of the Lakehouse table properties, there is a new toggle: W-Order.

If you have been following along with V-Order since Fabric went GA, you know it already does a solid job of optimizing Delta tables for read performance. W-Order is apparently the next generation. The acronym, according to the tooltip, stands for Wavelet-Optimized Recursive Delta Encoding Rewrite. It claims to apply wavelet decomposition to the Parquet column chunks and recursively re-encode them into what the UI calls “spectral micro-partitions” based on historical query access patterns.

I have no idea what half of that means. But I had to test it. Obviously.


Where to Find It

Open your Lakehouse in the Fabric portal. Navigate to Table properties on any Delta table, scroll down past the standard V-Order settings, and you should see the new section sitting right below it.

Flip the toggle, confirm the dialog, and the table enters what the UI calls a “spectral rewrite” phase. On my test table (around 48 million rows, partitioned by month), this took about four minutes. A small progress indicator shows up next to the table name in the explorer while it runs.

Spectral rewrite in progress, indicated by the spinner next to the table name

The Numbers

I ran the same aggregation query on the table before and after enabling W-Order. Same capacity, same time of day, same query, three runs each.

RunBefore (seconds)After (seconds)
114.30.34
213.80.33
314.10.34
Same query, same capacity, same data. Three consecutive runs.

That is roughly a 42x improvement. On a simple GROUP BY with a SUM. I nearly spilled my coffee.

0.34 seconds on 48 million rows. I had to run it again to believe it.

A Few Things to Note

  • Always check your runtime version first, the feature requires the April 2026 update
  • Premium or F64+ capacity is required. The toggle simply does not show up on lower SKUs
  • Reoptimization consumes CU credits, so keep an eye on your capacity metrics while the spectral rewrite runs
  • It only appears on Delta tables, not on shortcuts or mirrored tables
  • Latency on tables with heavy concurrent write loads is unknown, so proceed with some caution there

Microsoft has not published any documentation for this yet as far as I can tell. The feature might still be rolling out, so if you do not see the toggle, give it a day or two. The latest runtime update notes are here.

Go check your Lakehouse settings. And if something about this whole thing feels off, maybe take a second look at today’s date before you reorganize your entire data estate.

New EU Legislation potentially cripples #SQLServer2016

Today the Microsoft SQL Server Team took a huge blow, due to new EU legislation passed in the EU Commision. The kick-off of all this, is to be found in new features implemented in the not yet released version of SQL Server – Microsoft expects to release later this year.

At the #DataDriven event, on March 10th, Scott Guthrie (b|l|t) announced that SQL Server 2016 has “Everything built in”

This bold statement was apparently too much for an undisclosed competitor, so they filed a complaint with the EU Commision.

The claim to the EU Commision, is that Microsoft SQL Server is simply too hard to compete with – a leading spokesman from the claimant is to be quoted:

We simply cannot keep up with Microsoft anymore. It’s just not fair, that they have all the cool stuff. Plus, Reporting Services now looks like something build in this century.

The formal complaint filed to the EU Commision can be seen here:

On the basis of information received from end-users, SMEs active in the IT (information technology) sector and competitors of Microsoft, the Competition Directorate General of the European Commission has formally requested Microsoft to provide information about the new technical features of SQL Server 2016 in the context of EC competition law. This information should allow the Commission to verify allegations that Microsoft has designed SQL Server 2016 in a way which will dominate the market for Relational Database Systems and related offerings.

reference: here

Furthermore, the claimant has suggested the following restrictions on SQL Server, in order to level the playing field.

And finally the one that will really hamper SQL Server

The final one means that any query fired against SQL Server MUST be returned in less than 21 seconds. If not, the operation will time out and the results also. Outrageous, don’t you think!?